P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs DILIPBHAI SAVJIBHAI BAVALIYA — 285/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 021,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBT030031402025

Filing Number

285/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

285/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 021,R11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1

    Adv. C R TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILIPBHAI SAVJIBHAI BAVALIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 285/2025 Summary The court dismissed the case against respondent Dilipbhai Savjibhai Bavaliya due to the petitioner's (P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1) non-prosecution and non-appearance. Applying CPC 1908 Rule 21 and Rule 105(2), the court found that the case had remained pending for over 6 months without active prosecution by the creditor, warranting dismissal without prejudice to the creditor's future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 285/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 285/2025 Summary The court dismissed the case against respondent Dilipbhai Savjibhai Bavaliya due to the petitioner's (P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1) non-prosecution and non-appearance. Applying CPC 1908 Rule 21 and Rule 105(2), the court found that the case had remained pending for over 6 months without active prosecution by the creditor, warranting dismissal without prejudice to the creditor's future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case