P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs UGABHAI SAVSHIBHAI TAVIYA — 282/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 021,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJBT030031372025

Filing Number

282/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

282/2025

Registration Date

11-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 021,R11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1

    Adv. C R TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UGABHAI SAVSHIBHAI TAVIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed Case 282/2025 filed by P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1 against Ugabhai Savshibhai Taviya under Civil Procedure Code Section 21, Rule 105(2), due to the creditor's continuous non-appearance and lack of prosecution despite proper notice. The court found no justified reason for the extended delay and inaction in pursuing the case, warranting dismissal in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Dec-2025

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 282/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Case 282/2025 filed by P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1 against Ugabhai Savshibhai Taviya under Civil Procedure Code Section 21, Rule 105(2), due to the creditor's continuous non-appearance and lack of prosecution despite proper notice. The court found no justified reason for the extended delay and inaction in pursuing the case, warranting dismissal in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case