P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs CHELABHAI TOGABHAI BHARVAD — 280/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 021,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBT030031322025
Filing Number
280/2025
Filing Date
10-11-2025
Registration No
280/2025
Registration Date
10-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1
Adv. C R TRIVEDI
Respondent(s)
CHELABHAI TOGABHAI BHARVAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 21-02-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 22-01-2026 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
| 18-12-2025 | SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO JUDGEMENT DEBTOR |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 280/2025 The court dismissed the case against the debtor (Chelabhai Togabhai Bharvad) due to the creditor's (P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1) prolonged non-prosecution and absence. Under Civil Procedure Code Section 21 and Rule 105(2), the court found that the creditor failed to advance the proceedings despite being granted multiple opportunities, resulting in the case pending for over 6 months. The court held that such abandonment and lack of interest warranted dismissal in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 280/2025 The court dismissed the case against the debtor (Chelabhai Togabhai Bharvad) due to the creditor's (P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1) prolonged non-prosecution and absence. Under Civil Procedure Code Section 21 and Rule 105(2), the court found that the creditor failed to advance the proceedings despite being granted multiple opportunities, resulting in the case pending for over 6 months. The court held that such abandonment and lack of interest warranted dismissal in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts