THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PANKAJBHAI SHAMJIBHAI VANODIYA Advocate - K P SUNDHARVA — 2057/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 305(A),331(3),331(4),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030030272025
Filing Number
2057/2025
Filing Date
13-10-2025
Registration No
2057/2025
Registration Date
13-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190003250318
Police Station
DHASA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PANKAJBHAI SHAMJIBHAI VANODIYA Advocate - K P SUNDHARVA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 08-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 2057/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Pankajbhai Shamjibhai Vanodiya, was acquitted and discharged of all charges under BNS Sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), and 54. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed theft or house-breaking at the cement pipe factory and workshop. Although the complainant and witness testified about missing electric motors and iron rings valued at ₹1,80,000, neither witness could identify the accused as the perpetrator. The complainant explicitly stated he did not see the accused commit the theft and had no knowledge of who actually stole the items. The court emphasized that evidence quality matters more than quantity, and the prosecution's case lacked sufficient credible proof to establish the accused's guilt on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 2057/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Pankajbhai Shamjibhai Vanodiya, was acquitted and discharged of all charges under BNS Sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), and 54. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed theft or house-breaking at the cement pipe factory and workshop. Although the complainant and witness testified about missing electric motors and iron rings valued at ₹1,80,000, neither witness could identify the accused as the perpetrator. The complainant explicitly stated he did not see the accused commit the theft and had no knowledge of who actually stole the items. The court emphasized that evidence quality matters more than quantity, and the prosecution's case lacked sufficient credible proof to establish the accused's guilt on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts