THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PANKAJBHAI SHAMJIBHAI VANODIYA Advocate - K P SUNDHARVA — 2057/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 305(A),331(3),331(4),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT030030272025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2057/2025

Filing Date

13-10-2025

Registration No

2057/2025

Registration Date

13-10-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190003250318

Police Station

DHASA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 305(A),331(3),331(4),54

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PANKAJBHAI SHAMJIBHAI VANODIYA Advocate - K P SUNDHARVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

08-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 2057/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Pankajbhai Shamjibhai Vanodiya, was acquitted and discharged of all charges under BNS Sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), and 54. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed theft or house-breaking at the cement pipe factory and workshop. Although the complainant and witness testified about missing electric motors and iron rings valued at ₹1,80,000, neither witness could identify the accused as the perpetrator. The complainant explicitly stated he did not see the accused commit the theft and had no knowledge of who actually stole the items. The court emphasized that evidence quality matters more than quantity, and the prosecution's case lacked sufficient credible proof to establish the accused's guilt on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 2057/2025 Court Decision: The accused, Pankajbhai Shamjibhai Vanodiya, was acquitted and discharged of all charges under BNS Sections 305(A), 331(3), 331(4), and 54. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed theft or house-breaking at the cement pipe factory and workshop. Although the complainant and witness testified about missing electric motors and iron rings valued at ₹1,80,000, neither witness could identify the accused as the perpetrator. The complainant explicitly stated he did not see the accused commit the theft and had no knowledge of who actually stole the items. The court emphasized that evidence quality matters more than quantity, and the prosecution's case lacked sufficient credible proof to establish the accused's guilt on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case