THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ARIFBHAI ADAMBHAI RAFAI Advocate - B V KHACHAR — 1987/2024
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030029952024
Filing Number
1987/2024
Filing Date
09-08-2024
Registration No
1987/2024
Registration Date
09-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190004200806
Police Station
GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ARIFBHAI ADAMBHAI RAFAI Advocate - B V KHACHAR
JAYANTIBHAI VAJUBHAI SEKHALIYA
BHARATBHAI RAVATBHAI SEKHALIYA
SURESHBHAI BHARMALBHAI TAVIYA
DHIRUBHAI DEVABHAI DAV
Adv. B V KHACHAR
DEVRAJBHAI LALJIBHAI DERVANIYA
DILIPBHAI KANUBHAI MAKVANA (ABAT)
VIJAYBHAI MANJIBHAI JAMOD
Adv. B V KHACHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 17-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 30-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 31-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 1987/2024 The court convicted accused Arifbhai Adambhai Rafai under Section 12 of the Gambling Act (a general offense) based on his voluntary confession. Considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, remorse, family hardship, and commitment to reform, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹300 or 5 days imprisonment in default, along with seizure and forfeiture of confiscated materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 1987/2024 The court convicted accused Arifbhai Adambhai Rafai under Section 12 of the Gambling Act (a general offense) based on his voluntary confession. Considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, remorse, family hardship, and commitment to reform, the court imposed a lenient sentence below the statutory minimum: a fine of ₹300 or 5 days imprisonment in default, along with seizure and forfeiture of confiscated materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts