JAYDIPBHAI HARJIBHAI ANDHAN vs GHANSHYAMBHAI LALJIBHAI ITALIYA — 15/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,467,468,469,470,471,120(1-D),114. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJBT030020062024

Filing Number

15/2024

Filing Date

28-May-2024

Registration No

15/2024

Registration Date

28-May-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,467,468,469,470,471,120(1-D),114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYDIPBHAI HARJIBHAI ANDHAN

    Adv. K J PANCHOLI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GHANSHYAMBHAI LALJIBHAI ITALIYA

  2. 2.NITABEN DINESHBHAI NARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition under CrPC Section 203, finding that petitioner Jaydipbhai failed to establish a prima facie case against respondents Ghanshyambhai and Nitaben for alleged fraud related to a land transaction in Surat. The court determined that the respondents' conduct—obtaining Rs. 61 lakh through a purported land deal—did not constitute criminal offenses warranting police investigation, as the transaction appeared to be a civil contractual matter between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 26-Dec-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 20-Sep-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 08-Aug-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 01-Jul-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 20-May-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 03-Apr-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 07-Feb-2025

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 20-Dec-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 14-Nov-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 25-Oct-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 18-Oct-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 04-Oct-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 19-Sep-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 06-Sep-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 31-Aug-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 03-Aug-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 21-Jun-2024

    Process To Witnesses

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 12-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 28-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition under CrPC Section 203, finding that petitioner Jaydipbhai failed to establish a prima facie case against respondents Ghanshyambhai and Nitaben for alleged fraud related to a land transaction in Surat. The court determined that the respondents' conduct—obtaining Rs. 61 lakh through a purported land deal—did not constitute criminal offenses warranting police investigation, as the transaction appeared to be a civil contractual matter between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case