RAMJIBHAI VASHRAMBHAI GOHIL NA KU.MU. VALJIBHAI NARSHIBHAI RATHOD vs VASHARAMBHAI KESHUBHAI DABHI Advocate - D.A.MALVANIYA — 238/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 20th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT030015452021
Filing Number
238/2021
Filing Date
14-09-2021
Registration No
238/2021
Registration Date
14-09-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMJIBHAI VASHRAMBHAI GOHIL NA KU.MU. VALJIBHAI NARSHIBHAI RATHOD
Adv. G.B.SHUKLA, K J PANCHOLI
Respondent(s)
VASHARAMBHAI KESHUBHAI DABHI Advocate - D.A.MALVANIYA
PRATAPBHAI KESHUBHAI DABHI
Adv. D.A.MALVANIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 07-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS/238/2021 The court partly allowed the plaintiff's suit seeking injunctive relief against the defendants' encroachment on Plot No. 40 (100 sq. yards) in Dhasa Village, Botad. The court found that the plaintiff's property was validly allotted by government order dated 1-08-1972 (confirmed by Village Sample Form records), whereas the defendants' separate Plot No. 30 allocation was irrelevant. The court issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from constructing on or entering the plaintiff's property, vacated the earlier status quo order, and dismissed defendants' pleas regarding non-joinder of parties, limitation, and ownership defenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS/238/2021 The court partly allowed the plaintiff's suit seeking injunctive relief against the defendants' encroachment on Plot No. 40 (100 sq. yards) in Dhasa Village, Botad. The court found that the plaintiff's property was validly allotted by government order dated 1-08-1972 (confirmed by Village Sample Form records), whereas the defendants' separate Plot No. 30 allocation was irrelevant. The court issued a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from constructing on or entering the plaintiff's property, vacated the earlier status quo order, and dismissed defendants' pleas regarding non-joinder of parties, limitation, and ownership defenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts