THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ALPESHBHAI VAGHJIBHAI BOLIYA Advocate - V K SODHATAR — 930/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 352,351(4). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030012652025
Filing Number
930/2025
Filing Date
16-04-2025
Registration No
930/2025
Registration Date
16-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190004250109
Police Station
GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ALPESHBHAI VAGHJIBHAI BOLIYA Advocate - V K SODHATAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 10-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 930/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Alpeshbhai Vaghjibhai Boliya of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 352 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 351(4) (criminal intimidation by threat of death/grievous hurt), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony regarding a phone call dispute over loan repayment, the court found no concrete evidence of abusive language actually used or specific threats made. The court cited precedent establishing that for Section 504 offenses, actual abusive words must be established on record—vague complaints insufficient. No independent witnesses corroborated the allegations, and documentary evidence did not support conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Case No. 930/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Alpeshbhai Vaghjibhai Boliya of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 352 (intentional insult to provoke breach of peace) and 351(4) (criminal intimidation by threat of death/grievous hurt), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Despite the complainant's testimony regarding a phone call dispute over loan repayment, the court found no concrete evidence of abusive language actually used or specific threats made. The court cited precedent establishing that for Section 504 offenses, actual abusive words must be established on record—vague complaints insufficient. No independent witnesses corroborated the allegations, and documentary evidence did not support conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts