LAKSHMANBHAI JERAMBHAI MANDANI vs VINUBHAI ODHAVJIBHAI BHINSARA Advocate - V K SODHATAR — 773/2018

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 16th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT030009862018

Case disposed

Filing Number

773/2018

Filing Date

26-07-2018

Registration No

773/2018

Registration Date

26-07-2018

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

LAKSHMANBHAI JERAMBHAI MANDANI

Adv. V.M.KHACHAR

Respondent(s)

VINUBHAI ODHAVJIBHAI BHINSARA Advocate - V K SODHATAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

25-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

18-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

02-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CC.No.773/2018 Court: Judicial Magistrate F.C., Gadhada Petitioner: Lakshmanbhai Jerambhai Mandani Respondent: Vinubhai Odhavjibhai Bhinsara Decision: The court convicted the respondent under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, finding that a cheque given as security for a loan was dishonored despite notice. The court sentenced the respondent to six months imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹4 lakhs, with an additional order to refund the loan amount within 30 days or face extended imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.773/2018 Court: Judicial Magistrate F.C., Gadhada Petitioner: Lakshmanbhai Jerambhai Mandani Respondent: Vinubhai Odhavjibhai Bhinsara Decision: The court convicted the respondent under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, finding that a cheque given as security for a loan was dishonored despite notice. The court sentenced the respondent to six months imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹4 lakhs, with an additional order to refund the loan amount within 30 days or face extended imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case