LAKSHMANBHAI JERAMBHAI MANADANI vs VINUBHAI ODHAVJIBHAI BHINSARA Advocate - V K SODHATAR — 772/2018
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030009852018
Filing Number
772/2018
Filing Date
26-07-2018
Registration No
772/2018
Registration Date
26-07-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
LAKSHMANBHAI JERAMBHAI MANADANI
Adv. V.M.KHACHAR
Respondent(s)
VINUBHAI ODHAVJIBHAI BHINSARA Advocate - V K SODHATAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 18-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 772/2018 Court Decision: The court convicted the respondent (Vinubhai Odhavjibhai Bhinsara) of criminal breach of trust under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent was sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to repay Rs. 4,00,000 to the petitioner (Lakshmanbhai Jerambhai Manadani), whom he had defrauded through a bounced cheque that was supposed to represent borrowed money. The court found that the respondent dishonestly appropriated funds and misused a post-dated cheque given as security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 772/2018 Court Decision: The court convicted the respondent (Vinubhai Odhavjibhai Bhinsara) of criminal breach of trust under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The respondent was sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to repay Rs. 4,00,000 to the petitioner (Lakshmanbhai Jerambhai Manadani), whom he had defrauded through a bounced cheque that was supposed to represent borrowed money. The court found that the respondent dishonestly appropriated funds and misused a post-dated cheque given as security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts