NILESHBHAI HARESHBHAI MAKVANA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 45/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJBT030005542026

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31111250228793

Police Station

CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NILESHBHAI HARESHBHAI MAKVANA

    Adv. S M HERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 45/2026 Summary: The court allowed Nileshbhai Hareshbhai Makwana's application for interim custody of Rs. 5,044/- seized from fraudulent bank accounts (Airtel Payments Bank and Bank of Baroda) after he was victimized in a cyber fraud. The court found the accounts were opened solely for committing fraud and ordered the banks to transfer the seized amount back to the petitioner's SBI account within 10 days upon furnishing a personal surety bond of 1.5 times the amount, subject to various conditions including non-transferability until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing P.P.

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 45/2026 Summary: The court allowed Nileshbhai Hareshbhai Makwana's application for interim custody of Rs. 5,044/- seized from fraudulent bank accounts (Airtel Payments Bank and Bank of Baroda) after he was victimized in a cyber fraud. The court found the accounts were opened solely for committing fraud and ordered the banks to transfer the seized amount back to the petitioner's SBI account within 10 days upon furnishing a personal surety bond of 1.5 times the amount, subject to various conditions including non-transferability until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case