THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALABHAI JAGABHAI MEVADA Advocate - V K SODHATAR — 137/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 117(2),115(2),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT030003512026

Filing Number

137/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

137/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190004251713

Police Station

GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 117(2),115(2),352,351(3),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LALABHAI JAGABHAI MEVADA Advocate - V K SODHATAR

  2. 2.RANCHODBHAI JAGABHAI MEVADA

    Adv. V K SODHATAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused in a criminal case involving alleged assault and injuries. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under IPC Sections 117(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352, and 54 beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's and witness testimony lacked credibility and corroboration, and no independent medical evidence substantiated the alleged injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 137/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused in a criminal case involving alleged assault and injuries. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under IPC Sections 117(2), 115(2), 351(3), 352, and 54 beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's and witness testimony lacked credibility and corroboration, and no independent medical evidence substantiated the alleged injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case