THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHBHAI (UFF) PAKO GOVINDBHAI DHAROLIYA Advocate - K P SUNDHARVA — 98/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT030001882026
Filing Number
98/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
98/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190004251392
Police Station
GADHADA POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAKASHBHAI (UFF) PAKO GOVINDBHAI DHAROLIYA Advocate - K P SUNDHARVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Prakashbhai Pako Govindbhai Dharoliya (98/2026) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for possessing country-made liquor (1.08 liters worth ₹1,600). The court found insufficient evidence: while police seized liquor from the accused's premises, the prosecution failed to provide credible independent witness testimony or proper documentation establishing ownership, and the investigating officer's testimony lacked corroboration from unbiased witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2026
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Prakashbhai Pako Govindbhai Dharoliya (98/2026) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a) for possessing country-made liquor (1.08 liters worth ₹1,600). The court found insufficient evidence: while police seized liquor from the accused's premises, the prosecution failed to provide credible independent witness testimony or proper documentation establishing ownership, and the investigating officer's testimony lacked corroboration from unbiased witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts