P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY — 4/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 16th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT030000802026

Case disposed

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1

Adv. S C THAKAR

Respondent(s)

GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-05-2026

Disposed

05-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

22-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

07-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

16-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 4/2026 Court: Principal Civil Court, Gadhada Parties: P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1 (Petitioner) v. Ganeshbhai Jerambhai Jada (Respondent) Decision: The court decreed in favor of the petitioner, ordering the respondent to pay Rs. 29,185.24 with annual interest at 6% from the date of the bill until payment is made. The court found that the respondent, who was not an authorized consumer but acted as an unauthorized user, illegally drew electricity and caused unauthorized power theft. The respondent failed to respond to the notice demanding payment of the electricity bill amount. The court rejected the respondent's defense and held him liable for the unpaid electricity charges along with interest as claimed by the utility company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 4/2026 Court: Principal Civil Court, Gadhada Parties: P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1 (Petitioner) v. Ganeshbhai Jerambhai Jada (Respondent) Decision: The court decreed in favor of the petitioner, ordering the respondent to pay Rs. 29,185.24 with annual interest at 6% from the date of the bill until payment is made. The court found that the respondent, who was not an authorized consumer but acted as an unauthorized user, illegally drew electricity and caused unauthorized power theft. The respondent failed to respond to the notice demanding payment of the electricity bill amount. The court rejected the respondent's defense and held him liable for the unpaid electricity charges along with interest as claimed by the utility company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case