P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY — 4/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 16th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT030000802026
Filing Number
4/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1
Adv. S C THAKAR
Respondent(s)
GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 4/2026 Court: Principal Civil Court, Gadhada Parties: P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1 (Petitioner) v. Ganeshbhai Jerambhai Jada (Respondent) Decision: The court decreed in favor of the petitioner, ordering the respondent to pay Rs. 29,185.24 with annual interest at 6% from the date of the bill until payment is made. The court found that the respondent, who was not an authorized consumer but acted as an unauthorized user, illegally drew electricity and caused unauthorized power theft. The respondent failed to respond to the notice demanding payment of the electricity bill amount. The court rejected the respondent's defense and held him liable for the unpaid electricity charges along with interest as claimed by the utility company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 4/2026 Court: Principal Civil Court, Gadhada Parties: P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1 (Petitioner) v. Ganeshbhai Jerambhai Jada (Respondent) Decision: The court decreed in favor of the petitioner, ordering the respondent to pay Rs. 29,185.24 with annual interest at 6% from the date of the bill until payment is made. The court found that the respondent, who was not an authorized consumer but acted as an unauthorized user, illegally drew electricity and caused unauthorized power theft. The respondent failed to respond to the notice demanding payment of the electricity bill amount. The court rejected the respondent's defense and held him liable for the unpaid electricity charges along with interest as claimed by the utility company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts