P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY — 3/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 16th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT030000792026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1

Adv. S C THAKAR

Respondent(s)

GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-05-2026

Disposed

05-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

22-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

07-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

16-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: R.C.S.NO.3/2026 Court: Principal Civil Court, Gadhada Parties: P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1 (Petitioner) v. Ganeshbhai Jerambhai Jada (Respondent) Decision: The court held the respondent liable for unauthorized electricity theft and ordered payment of Rs. 7,652.55 as the electricity bill amount. The respondent must pay this sum along with 6% annual interest from the date of notice until payment, and bear all court costs. The court found that the respondent illegally drew power without proper connection authorization, constituting electricity theft under the Electricity Act, 2003, and rejected the respondent's defense for non-appearance and lack of valid evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S.NO.3/2026 Court: Principal Civil Court, Gadhada Parties: P.G.V.C.L Gadhada Rural 1 (Petitioner) v. Ganeshbhai Jerambhai Jada (Respondent) Decision: The court held the respondent liable for unauthorized electricity theft and ordered payment of Rs. 7,652.55 as the electricity bill amount. The respondent must pay this sum along with 6% annual interest from the date of notice until payment, and bear all court costs. The court found that the respondent illegally drew power without proper connection authorization, constituting electricity theft under the Electricity Act, 2003, and rejected the respondent's defense for non-appearance and lack of valid evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, GADHADA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case