P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs LAXMIBEN GANESHBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY — 2/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 16th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT030000782026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1
Adv. S C THAKAR
Respondent(s)
LAXMIBEN GANESHBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: R.C.S.NO.2/2026 The Principal Civil Court, Gadhada decided a dispute between P.G.V.C.L (petitioner/plaintiff electricity company) and Laxmiben Ganeshbhai Jada (respondent) over unlawful electricity consumption charges. The court ruled that the respondent illegally drew electricity without proper authorization, causing unauthorized power theft amounting to ₹24,986.59, and ordered her to pay this sum plus 18% annual interest from the notice date until full payment, with additional 6% interest thereafter. The court also granted the electricity company the right to confiscate the respondent's property if payment is not made, and directed recovery proceedings against the respondent for unauthorized electricity usage violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S.NO.2/2026 The Principal Civil Court, Gadhada decided a dispute between P.G.V.C.L (petitioner/plaintiff electricity company) and Laxmiben Ganeshbhai Jada (respondent) over unlawful electricity consumption charges. The court ruled that the respondent illegally drew electricity without proper authorization, causing unauthorized power theft amounting to ₹24,986.59, and ordered her to pay this sum plus 18% annual interest from the notice date until full payment, with additional 6% interest thereafter. The court also granted the electricity company the right to confiscate the respondent's property if payment is not made, and directed recovery proceedings against the respondent for unauthorized electricity usage violations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts