P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 vs GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY — 1/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 16th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT030000772026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
1/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, GADHADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1
Adv. S C THAKAR
Respondent(s)
GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA Advocate - EX PARTY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 v. GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA (R.C.S.NO.1/2026) The court ruled in favor of the petitioner (P.G.V.C.L) against the respondent, ordering payment of electricity bill dues totaling ₹25,229.66 plus 6% annual interest until settlement, along with additional surcharges of ₹17,500.01 and ₹7,729.65. The respondent unlawfully drew electricity without proper authorization, bypassing regulatory procedures, and failed to pay the assessed charges despite notice, making him liable for the unauthorized consumption penalties and interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: P.G.V.C.L GADHADA RURAL 1 v. GANESHBHAI JERAMBHAI JADA (R.C.S.NO.1/2026) The court ruled in favor of the petitioner (P.G.V.C.L) against the respondent, ordering payment of electricity bill dues totaling ₹25,229.66 plus 6% annual interest until settlement, along with additional surcharges of ₹17,500.01 and ₹7,729.65. The respondent unlawfully drew electricity without proper authorization, bypassing regulatory procedures, and failed to pay the assessed charges despite notice, making him liable for the unauthorized consumption penalties and interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts