PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD vs KISHORBHAI KHIMJIBHAI GADHIYA LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED KHIMJIBHAI ZAVERBHAI GADHIYA — 420/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 27th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020266502025
Filing Number
420/2025
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
420/2025
Registration Date
12-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD
Adv. P R BATHWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHORBHAI KHIMJIBHAI GADHIYA LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED KHIMJIBHAI ZAVERBHAI GADHIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Kishorbhai Khimjibhai Gadhiya (420/2025) The Court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery. Finding that an inspection on 23/10/2023 revealed illegal modifications to the meter (2910 watts illegal load), the Court held the defendant liable for the principal amount of Rs.49,793.06 plus Delayed Payment Charges. However, the Court reduced the claimed 18% interest to 6% simple interest per annum, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate. The defendant, who did not appear or defend, must also bear litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 420/2025
Case Summary: PGVCL v. Kishorbhai Khimjibhai Gadhiya (420/2025) The Court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery. Finding that an inspection on 23/10/2023 revealed illegal modifications to the meter (2910 watts illegal load), the Court held the defendant liable for the principal amount of Rs.49,793.06 plus Delayed Payment Charges. However, the Court reduced the claimed 18% interest to 6% simple interest per annum, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate. The defendant, who did not appear or defend, must also bear litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts