HETALBEN BABUBHAI CHAUHAN W/O CHETANKUMAR RASIKBHAI vs CHETANKUMAR RASIKBHAI PARMAR Advocate - T H JANI — 836/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 144(3). Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 27th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBT020181582025
Filing Number
836/2025
Filing Date
14-Oct-2025
Registration No
836/2025
Registration Date
14-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HETALBEN BABUBHAI CHAUHAN W/O CHETANKUMAR RASIKBHAI
Adv. U Y BELIM
-
2.MINOR DHRUVI CHETANBHAI
Adv. U Y BELIM
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHETANKUMAR RASIKBHAI PARMAR Advocate - T H JANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petition filed by Hetalben Babubhai Chauhan and minor Dhruvi Chetanbhai against Chetankumar Rasikbhai Parmar. The court found that the respondent had received money from the petitioner under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, and the petitioner sought recovery of that amount. The court ruled that the petition was disposed of based on the evidence presented and the applicable legal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 836/2025
The court dismissed the petition filed by Hetalben Babubhai Chauhan and minor Dhruvi Chetanbhai against Chetankumar Rasikbhai Parmar. The court found that the respondent had received money from the petitioner under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, and the petitioner sought recovery of that amount. The court ruled that the petition was disposed of based on the evidence presented and the applicable legal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts