PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs SELABHAI KHIMABHAI BOLIYA — 44/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBT020097412025
Filing Number
44/2025
Filing Date
06-Aug-2025
Registration No
44/2025
Registration Date
06-Aug-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1
Adv. K G DABHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SELABHAI KHIMABHAI BOLIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed PGVCL Botad Town 1's application by default on March 13, 2026, finding that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case. Multiple garnishee warrants were issued since the case's filing, but the petitioner's representative repeatedly failed to appear in court, and the warrants were never executed. The court found the petitioner's lack of diligence in advancing the matter warranted dismissal without any cost orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2025
The court dismissed PGVCL Botad Town 1's application by default on March 13, 2026, finding that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the case. Multiple garnishee warrants were issued since the case's filing, but the petitioner's representative repeatedly failed to appear in court, and the warrants were never executed. The court found the petitioner's lack of diligence in advancing the matter warranted dismissal without any cost orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts