PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs DINESHBHAI PARSHOTAMBHAI MITHAPARA — 43/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBT020097402025
Filing Number
43/2025
Filing Date
06-Aug-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
06-Aug-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1
Adv. K G DABHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.DINESHBHAI PARSHOTAMBHAI MITHAPARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed PGVCL Botad Town 1's petition for default of the petitioner. The court found the case was very old, multiple arrest warrants had been issued, and the petitioner's representative failed to appear on the last hearing date (17/02/2026), indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The petition was consequently dismissed due to the petitioner's default, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2025
The court dismissed PGVCL Botad Town 1's petition for default of the petitioner. The court found the case was very old, multiple arrest warrants had been issued, and the petitioner's representative failed to appear on the last hearing date (17/02/2026), indicating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The petition was consequently dismissed due to the petitioner's default, with no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts