PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs SANJAYBHAI VIHABHAI RATHOD — 41/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,R11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJBT020097382025
Filing Number
41/2025
Filing Date
06-Aug-2025
Registration No
41/2025
Registration Date
06-Aug-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1
Adv. K G DABHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAYBHAI VIHABHAI RATHOD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL Botad Town 1 against Sanjaybhai Vihabhai Rathod on the grounds of default. The court found that the petitioner lacked interest in pursuing the case, as evidenced by repeated non-appearance of the petitioner's representative despite multiple warrants being issued and the bailiff's report confirming absence at the hearing on 17/02/2026. The dismissal was ordered as a default judgment with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Warrant Of Attachment
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2025
The court dismissed the petition filed by PGVCL Botad Town 1 against Sanjaybhai Vihabhai Rathod on the grounds of default. The court found that the petitioner lacked interest in pursuing the case, as evidenced by repeated non-appearance of the petitioner's representative despite multiple warrants being issued and the bailiff's report confirming absence at the hearing on 17/02/2026. The dismissal was ordered as a default judgment with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts