JADAV BHARATBHAI JIVRAJBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M M CHAUHAN — 221/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBT020060992026

Case disposed

Filing Number

221/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

221/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

4-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

JADAV BHARATBHAI JIVRAJBHAI

Adv. N D VALANI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M M CHAUHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

24-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

HEARING P.P.

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRMA J NO. 221/2026 The Botad Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed Bharatbhai Jivrajbhai Jadav's application under Section 503 BNSS, granting him interim custody of Rs. 11,667/- seized by Cyber Crime Police after he was defrauded of Rs. 19,910/-. The court found the applicant was a cyber crime victim and the receiving account was opened solely for fraud purposes, justifying return of the seized amount to the victim. The court ordered Rajsthan Gramin Bank to transfer the amount to the applicant's Bank of India account within 10 days upon furnishing personal surety bonds, subject to conditions including court production of funds and return if legitimate claimants emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA J NO. 221/2026 The Botad Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed Bharatbhai Jivrajbhai Jadav's application under Section 503 BNSS, granting him interim custody of Rs. 11,667/- seized by Cyber Crime Police after he was defrauded of Rs. 19,910/-. The court found the applicant was a cyber crime victim and the receiving account was opened solely for fraud purposes, justifying return of the seized amount to the victim. The court ordered Rajsthan Gramin Bank to transfer the amount to the applicant's Bank of India account within 10 days upon furnishing personal surety bonds, subject to conditions including court production of funds and return if legitimate claimants emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case