JADAV BHARATBHAI JIVRAJBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M M CHAUHAN — 221/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBT020060992026

Filing Number

221/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

221/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

4-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JADAV BHARATBHAI JIVRAJBHAI

    Adv. N D VALANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - M M CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMA J NO. 221/2026 The Botad Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed Bharatbhai Jivrajbhai Jadav's application under Section 503 BNSS, granting him interim custody of Rs. 11,667/- seized by Cyber Crime Police after he was defrauded of Rs. 19,910/-. The court found the applicant was a cyber crime victim and the receiving account was opened solely for fraud purposes, justifying return of the seized amount to the victim. The court ordered Rajsthan Gramin Bank to transfer the amount to the applicant's Bank of India account within 10 days upon furnishing personal surety bonds, subject to conditions including court production of funds and return if legitimate claimants emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 221/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA J NO. 221/2026 The Botad Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed Bharatbhai Jivrajbhai Jadav's application under Section 503 BNSS, granting him interim custody of Rs. 11,667/- seized by Cyber Crime Police after he was defrauded of Rs. 19,910/-. The court found the applicant was a cyber crime victim and the receiving account was opened solely for fraud purposes, justifying return of the seized amount to the victim. The court ordered Rajsthan Gramin Bank to transfer the amount to the applicant's Bank of India account within 10 days upon furnishing personal surety bonds, subject to conditions including court production of funds and return if legitimate claimants emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case