ZAPADIYA VINODBHAI DHIRUBHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 217/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBT020059892026

Case disposed

Filing Number

217/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

4-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

ZAPADIYA VINODBHAI DHIRUBHAI

Adv. A R LASHKARI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

13-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of CRMA J NO. 217/2026 The court allowed Zampadiya Vinodbhai Dhirubhai's application under Section 503 BNSS as a cyber crime victim, granting interim custody of Rs. 8,363/- seized from three bank accounts. The court ordered three banks (Punjab & Sind, HDFC, and Axis) to return Rs. 6,983/-, Rs. 700/-, and Rs. 680/- respectively to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account within 10 days, subject to furnishing 1.5x personal surety and equal surety amount, with conditions that the funds be produced before court if demanded and returned if rightful claimants emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRMA J NO. 217/2026 The court allowed Zampadiya Vinodbhai Dhirubhai's application under Section 503 BNSS as a cyber crime victim, granting interim custody of Rs. 8,363/- seized from three bank accounts. The court ordered three banks (Punjab & Sind, HDFC, and Axis) to return Rs. 6,983/-, Rs. 700/-, and Rs. 680/- respectively to the applicant's Bank of Baroda account within 10 days, subject to furnishing 1.5x personal surety and equal surety amount, with conditions that the funds be produced before court if demanded and returned if rightful claimants emerge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case