NURJAHA KASAMBHAI MANKAD W/O KHALID GANIBHAI MANKAD vs KHALID GANIBHAI MANKAD Advocate - R A MEKHIYA — 263/2021

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,18,19,20,22. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBT020046312021

Filing Number

263/2021

Filing Date

25-Oct-2021

Registration No

263/2021

Registration Date

25-Oct-2021

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

4-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12,18,19,20,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NURJAHA KASAMBHAI MANKAD W/O KHALID GANIBHAI MANKAD

    Adv. R M MAKWANA

  2. 2.MINOR MAHMADTALHA KHALID

    Adv. R M MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHALID GANIBHAI MANKAD Advocate - R A MEKHIYA

  2. 2.GANIBHAI IBRAHIMBHAI MANKAD

    Adv. R A MEKHIYA

  3. 3.KHUMEZ GANIBHAI MANKAD

    Adv. R A MEKHIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: 263/2021 Court's Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Botad partially granted the petitioner's application under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found the respondent (husband) guilty of subjecting the petitioner to physical and mental domestic abuse, including beatings, verbal abuse, and economic harassment, resulting in two miscarriages during her pregnancies. Key Orders: - Respondent must pay monthly housing rent of ₹1,500 to the petitioner - Monthly maintenance of ₹2,500 for petitioner and ₹1,500 for minor child (total ₹4,000) - Compensation of ₹10,000 for mental trauma caused by domestic violence - No specific order under Section 18 (protection from threats) as evidence was insufficient The court rejected the respondent's denial of abuse, finding the petitioner's testimony and witnesses credible, and noted the respondent failed to present substantive counter-evidence during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 03-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  11. 29-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  13. 25-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  14. 01-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  15. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  16. 01-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  18. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  19. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  20. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  21. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  22. 02-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  23. 14-May-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  24. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 24-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 23-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 18-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 24-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 04-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 06-May-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  37. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  38. 20-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  39. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  40. 13-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  41. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  42. 29-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  43. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  44. 27-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  45. 19-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  46. 17-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  47. 17-May-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  48. 15-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  49. 04-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  50. 04-Feb-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  51. 03-Jan-2023

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  52. 22-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  53. 11-Oct-2022

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  54. 01-Sep-2022

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  55. 16-Jul-2022

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  56. 17-Jun-2022

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  57. 10-Jun-2022

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  58. 03-Jun-2022

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  59. 22-Apr-2022

    Reply

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  60. 29-Jan-2022

    Notice To Opponents

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  61. 01-Jan-2022

    Notice To Opponents

    4Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  62. 07-Dec-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    4Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  63. 22-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 25-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 263/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 263/2021 Court's Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Botad partially granted the petitioner's application under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found the respondent (husband) guilty of subjecting the petitioner to physical and mental domestic abuse, including beatings, verbal abuse, and economic harassment, resulting in two miscarriages during her pregnancies. Key Orders: - Respondent must pay monthly housing rent of ₹1,500 to the petitioner - Monthly maintenance of ₹2,500 for petitioner and ₹1,500 for minor child (total ₹4,000) - Compensation of ₹10,000 for mental trauma caused by domestic violence - No specific order under Section 18 (protection from threats) as evidence was insufficient The court rejected the respondent's denial of abuse, finding the petitioner's testimony and witnesses credible, and noted the respondent failed to present substantive counter-evidence during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case