DECEASED RAHIMBHAI UMARBHAI KHALYANI HEIR OF ASHRAFBHAI RAHIMBHAI KHALYANI vs GHANSHYAMBHAI KARAMSHIBHAI TEJANI Advocate - M A JOSHI — 76/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020046172023
Filing Number
76/2023
Filing Date
16-Sep-2023
Registration No
76/2023
Registration Date
16-Sep-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
4-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DECEASED RAHIMBHAI UMARBHAI KHALYANI HEIR OF ASHRAFBHAI RAHIMBHAI KHALYANI
Adv. C R MEHTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.GHANSHYAMBHAI KARAMSHIBHAI TEJANI Advocate - M A JOSHI
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
24-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
19-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
07-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Apr-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
27-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
10-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
10-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
04-Jan-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
16-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Dec-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Nov-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Oct-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Sep-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
16-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Aug-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Jul-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
14-Jun-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-May-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
27-Mar-2024
Order
Case Summary: RCS 76/2023 The plaintiff (heir of Rahimbhai) sought a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with his lawful possession of a rented shop. The plaintiff claimed his late father received the shop as a tenant in 2002 at Rs. 200/month rent and has continuously occupied it for garage work. The defendant disputed this, contending no tenancy agreement existed and possession was never granted. The court rejected the injunction application, finding the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The plaintiff produced only electricity bills but no rent agreement, rent receipts, or documentary evidence proving the landlord-tenant relationship. The court held that without substantiating documents establishing tenancy, protection of possession cannot be granted—physical occupation alone is insufficient. All three conditions for interim injunction (prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable harm) were answered in the negative. The application was dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2024
Issues
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
26-Mar-2024
Order On Injuction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Feb-2024
Order On Injuction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Feb-2024
Order On Injuction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Dec-2023
Order On Injuction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
21-Dec-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
20-Nov-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
23-Oct-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Oct-2023
Written Statement/Reply
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
25-Sep-2023
Summons - Notice
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 76/2023
Case Summary: RCS 76/2023 The plaintiff (heir of Rahimbhai) sought a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with his lawful possession of a rented shop. The plaintiff claimed his late father received the shop as a tenant in 2002 at Rs. 200/month rent and has continuously occupied it for garage work. The defendant disputed this, contending no tenancy agreement existed and possession was never granted. The court rejected the injunction application, finding the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The plaintiff produced only electricity bills but no rent agreement, rent receipts, or documentary evidence proving the landlord-tenant relationship. The court held that without substantiating documents establishing tenancy, protection of possession cannot be granted—physical occupation alone is insufficient. All three conditions for interim injunction (prima facie case, balance of convenience, irreparable harm) were answered in the negative. The application was dismissed with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts