PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 2 vs ASHOKBHAI KALYANBHAI DABHI Advocate - B A GOPLANI — 195/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT020041062024

Filing Number

195/2024

Filing Date

12-Sep-2024

Registration No

195/2024

Registration Date

12-Sep-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 2

    Adv. S A KHERANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKBHAI KALYANBHAI DABHI Advocate - B A GOPLANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: RCS 195/2024 The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery against defendant Ashokbhai Kalyanbhai Dabhi. The court found that on 18/08/2023, inspection revealed the defendant had illegally extended a private wire from his fuse board, unlawfully consuming 3197 watts. The uncontroverted documentary and oral evidence—including inspection reports and supplementary bills—established the theft and defendant's liability for Rs.67,696.59. However, the court reduced the claimed 24% interest to 6% simple per annum, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount plus 6% interest from suit filing until realization, plus costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Defendant Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  11. 18-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  13. 09-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  14. 26-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  15. 21-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  16. 08-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  17. 16-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  18. 24-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 08-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 11-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 07-Jan-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 14-Dec-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  23. 18-Nov-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  24. 21-Oct-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  25. 12-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 12-Sep-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 195/2024 The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery against defendant Ashokbhai Kalyanbhai Dabhi. The court found that on 18/08/2023, inspection revealed the defendant had illegally extended a private wire from his fuse board, unlawfully consuming 3197 watts. The uncontroverted documentary and oral evidence—including inspection reports and supplementary bills—established the theft and defendant's liability for Rs.67,696.59. However, the court reduced the claimed 24% interest to 6% simple per annum, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount plus 6% interest from suit filing until realization, plus costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case