THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BATUKBHAI GOVINDBHAI GOSLIYA Advocate - A D VALA, M S SOMANI, M S SOMANIR L KUKADIYA,, M S SOMANIR L KUKADIYA,A S METALIYA,, M S SOMANIR L KUKADIYA,A S METALIYA,R R MER,, M S SOMANIR L KUKADIYA,A S METALIYA,R R MER,R A LIMBADIYA, — 2984/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT020036712023
Filing Number
2984/2023
Filing Date
25-Jul-2023
Registration No
2984/2023
Registration Date
25-Jul-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190002230537
Police Station
BOTAD TOWN POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BATUKBHAI GOVINDBHAI GOSLIYA Advocate - A D VALA, M S SOMANI, M S SOMANIR L KUKADIYA,, M S SOMANIR L KUKADIYA,A S METALIYA,, M S SOMANIR L KUKADIYA,A S METALIYA,R R MER,, M S SOMANIR L KUKADIYA,A S METALIYA,R R MER,R A LIMBADIYA,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. BATUKBHAI GOVINDBHAI GOSLIYA (2984/2023) Court Decision The Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Botad acquitted the accused Batukbhai Govindbhai Gosliya of charges under IPC Sections 354(D) (stalking), 506(2) (criminal intimidation), and 504 (intentional insult). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite presenting witness testimonies from the complainant and family members. Key Reasoning The complainant alleged that the accused had harassed her with abusive language, threats of violence, and circulation of intimate photos/videos while pressuring her to continue a prior relationship. However, the court observed critical inconsistencies: the complainant herself did not mention specific abusive words or threats in her statement; the alleged photo/video circulation claim was mentioned only during examination-in-chief but omitted from the FIR; and witnesses could not corroborate these facts. The court emphasized that since the complainant (victim) failed to support the prosecution's case adequately and witnesses only provided general statements without concrete details, no essential ingredient of the charged offenses was proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
01-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
31-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
29-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
30-Jan-2025
Framing Of Charge
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
10-Jan-2025
Framing Of Charge
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Dec-2024
Framing Of Charge
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
06-Dec-2024
Framing Of Charge
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Nov-2024
Framing Of Charge
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
02-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
08-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
20-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
16-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
12-Feb-2024
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
25-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
07-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
06-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2984/2023
Case Summary: THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. BATUKBHAI GOVINDBHAI GOSLIYA (2984/2023) Court Decision The Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Botad acquitted the accused Batukbhai Govindbhai Gosliya of charges under IPC Sections 354(D) (stalking), 506(2) (criminal intimidation), and 504 (intentional insult). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt despite presenting witness testimonies from the complainant and family members. Key Reasoning The complainant alleged that the accused had harassed her with abusive language, threats of violence, and circulation of intimate photos/videos while pressuring her to continue a prior relationship. However, the court observed critical inconsistencies: the complainant herself did not mention specific abusive words or threats in her statement; the alleged photo/video circulation claim was mentioned only during examination-in-chief but omitted from the FIR; and witnesses could not corroborate these facts. The court emphasized that since the complainant (victim) failed to support the prosecution's case adequately and witnesses only provided general statements without concrete details, no essential ingredient of the charged offenses was proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts