THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PARESHBHAI @ PARINGO CHOTHABHAI BERANI Advocate - A.D.VALA — 2056/2018

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,98,81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT020035482018

Filing Number

2056/2018

Filing Date

26-Nov-2018

Registration No

2056/2018

Registration Date

26-Nov-2018

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

4-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

BOTAD TOWN POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,98,81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARESHBHAI @ PARINGO CHOTHABHAI BERANI Advocate - A.D.VALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: CC 2056/2018 The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Botad acquitted the accused, Pareshbhai Chothabhai Berani, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65(a)(i), 81, 98(d)) due to insufficient evidence. Although foreign liquor bottles, a mobile phone, and a motorcycle were allegedly seized from the accused's possession on 22 February 2018, the court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case: the panch (witness) testimony lacked proper corroboration regarding the seizure of contraband items, and no independent witnesses substantiated the recovery. The court granted the accused the benefit of doubt under CrPC Section 248(1), acquitting him while ordering destruction of prohibited materials and forfeiture of the vehicle after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  10. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  12. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  13. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  14. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  15. 08-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  16. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 04-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 25-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 18-May-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  26. 06-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  27. 21-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  28. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  29. 22-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  30. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  31. 16-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  32. 21-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  33. 24-Apr-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 20-Mar-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 22-Dec-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 26-Sep-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 13-Jul-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 20-May-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 07-Apr-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 25-Feb-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 13-Jan-2022

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 09-Dec-2021

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 12-Nov-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 23-Sep-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 09-Aug-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 02-Jul-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 21-May-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 07-May-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 26-Mar-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 11-Feb-2021

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 30-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 20-Nov-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 18-Sep-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 28-Jul-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 16-Jun-2020

    Process To Accused

  56. 06-May-2020

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  57. 19-Mar-2020

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  58. 24-Feb-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  59. 27-Jan-2020

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  60. 27-Nov-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  61. 22-Oct-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  62. 26-Aug-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  63. 25-Jun-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  64. 14-May-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  65. 18-Mar-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 05-Mar-2019

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 20-Feb-2019

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  68. 06-Feb-2019

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  69. 25-Jan-2019

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  70. 18-Jan-2019

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  71. 04-Jan-2019

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  72. 21-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  73. 26-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2056/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 2056/2018 The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Botad acquitted the accused, Pareshbhai Chothabhai Berani, of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 65(a)(i), 81, 98(d)) due to insufficient evidence. Although foreign liquor bottles, a mobile phone, and a motorcycle were allegedly seized from the accused's possession on 22 February 2018, the court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case: the panch (witness) testimony lacked proper corroboration regarding the seizure of contraband items, and no independent witnesses substantiated the recovery. The court granted the accused the benefit of doubt under CrPC Section 248(1), acquitting him while ordering destruction of prohibited materials and forfeiture of the vehicle after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case