SHREE RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD vs BHIMJIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI GHODAKIYA Advocate - R D GIDA — 2401/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT020027392023

Filing Number

2401/2023

Filing Date

19-May-2023

Registration No

2401/2023

Registration Date

19-May-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

4-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHREE RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD

    Adv. H M KUKADIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIMJIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI GHODAKIYA Advocate - R D GIDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: 2401/2023 Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Bhimjibhai Khimjibhai Ghodakiya of charges under the Negotiable Instrument Act, Section 138, finding the complainant failed to establish that the bounced cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt within the 3-year statutory limitation period. Key Reasoning: The court determined that while a cheque of ₹80,000 was returned with "Wrongly Presented Item" reason, the loan transaction occurred on 11-01-2017, but the cheque was deposited on 11-03-2023—nearly 6 years later, well beyond the 3-year limitation. The court held that without proving a legally enforceable debt within the statutory period or written acknowledgment extending the debt within 3 years, the cheque could not attract Section 138 NI Act charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  12. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  13. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  15. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  17. 16-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  18. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  19. 29-May-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    4Th Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  20. 14-May-2025

    Evidence Of Defence

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  21. 16-Apr-2025

    Further Statement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  22. 13-Mar-2025

    Further Statement

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  23. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  24. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  25. 23-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  26. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  27. 25-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  28. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  29. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  30. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  31. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  32. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  33. 26-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  34. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  35. 28-May-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  36. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  37. 06-Mar-2024

    Evidence Of Complainant

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  38. 24-Jan-2024

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  39. 06-Dec-2023

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  40. 26-Oct-2023

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  41. 09-Sep-2023

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  42. 19-Jul-2023

    Notice To Opponents

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  43. 19-May-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  44. 19-May-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2401/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 2401/2023 Court Decision: The Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused Bhimjibhai Khimjibhai Ghodakiya of charges under the Negotiable Instrument Act, Section 138, finding the complainant failed to establish that the bounced cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt within the 3-year statutory limitation period. Key Reasoning: The court determined that while a cheque of ₹80,000 was returned with "Wrongly Presented Item" reason, the loan transaction occurred on 11-01-2017, but the cheque was deposited on 11-03-2023—nearly 6 years later, well beyond the 3-year limitation. The court held that without proving a legally enforceable debt within the statutory period or written acknowledgment extending the debt within 3 years, the cheque could not attract Section 138 NI Act charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case