SANJAYBHAI THAKARSHIBHAI RATHOD vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 203/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJBT020018902026

Case disposed

Filing Number

203/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

203/2026

Registration Date

24-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

4-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 503

Petitioner(s)

SANJAYBHAI THAKARSHIBHAI RATHOD

Adv. A R LASHKARI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 4-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

HEARING P.P.

07-03-2026

HEARING P.P.

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRMA J No. 203/2026 The court allowed applicant Sanjaybhai Thakarshibhai Rathod's petition under Section 503 BNSS to recover Rs. 7,998 fraudulently transferred from his SBI account to two suspect accounts (IDBI Bank and Karnataka Bank). Finding prima facie evidence that the recipient accounts were opened solely for fraud and noting no objections from their owners, the court granted interim custody of the seized amount to the petitioner, conditional on furnishing surety bonds equal to 1.5 times the amount, with banks ordered to transfer funds to his account within 10 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA J No. 203/2026 The court allowed applicant Sanjaybhai Thakarshibhai Rathod's petition under Section 503 BNSS to recover Rs. 7,998 fraudulently transferred from his SBI account to two suspect accounts (IDBI Bank and Karnataka Bank). Finding prima facie evidence that the recipient accounts were opened solely for fraud and noting no objections from their owners, the court granted interim custody of the seized amount to the petitioner, conditional on furnishing surety bonds equal to 1.5 times the amount, with banks ordered to transfer funds to his account within 10 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case