THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAJESHBHAI @ RAJU BACHUBHAI SADAMIYA Advocate - G.B.SOLANKI — 388/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT020004602017
Filing Number
388/2017
Filing Date
09-Mar-2017
Registration No
388/2017
Registration Date
09-Mar-2017
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
BOTAD TOWN POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJESHBHAI @ RAJU BACHUBHAI SADAMIYA Advocate - G.B.SOLANKI
-
2.PITAMBAR @ DADIYO BAJUBHAI MANDURIYA
Adv. G.B.SANKALIYA
-
3.PRAVINBHAI RAYSANGBHAI MANDURIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: FIR 388/2017 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Botad acquitted defendant Rajesh @ Raju Bachubhai Sadamiya of charges under IPC Sections 380, 454, and 114 (burglary and theft), finding insufficient evidence to prove the accusations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution presented testimonies from the complainant and multiple witnesses regarding a theft of ₹2,32,000 in gold, silver jewelry, and cash from a residential home in 2011, and evidence of recovery of some stolen goods from the co-accused Pitambar, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. Prosecution witnesses admitted they did not know who committed the theft, could not identify the accused as perpetrators, and had no direct evidence linking the accused to the crime. Panchnama witnesses could not substantiate their documentary evidence, and the recovered materials could not be conclusively connected to the complainant's case. Consequently, the court held the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
06-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
02-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
19-Oct-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
21-Sep-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-Aug-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
05-Jul-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
21-Jun-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
31-May-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-May-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
06-Apr-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
21-Mar-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Dec-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
13-Oct-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
18-Aug-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
25-Apr-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jan-2023
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Dec-2022
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2022
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Sep-2022
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jul-2022
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-May-2022
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Feb-2022
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2021
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Oct-2021
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2021
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-May-2021
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2021
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Jan-2021
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Oct-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Sep-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Jul-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jun-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
-
08-May-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
23-Mar-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Mar-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2020
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Dec-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Dec-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Nov-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Oct-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Aug-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jul-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jul-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jun-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jun-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-May-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
14-May-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Apr-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Feb-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jan-2019
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Dec-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Nov-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Sep-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Aug-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jul-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jun-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Mar-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Feb-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2018
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Dec-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Sep-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Aug-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jun-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jun-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jun-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-May-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2017
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Apr-2017
Copies To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Apr-2017
Copies To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2017
Copies To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 388/2017
Case Summary: FIR 388/2017 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Botad acquitted defendant Rajesh @ Raju Bachubhai Sadamiya of charges under IPC Sections 380, 454, and 114 (burglary and theft), finding insufficient evidence to prove the accusations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: Although the prosecution presented testimonies from the complainant and multiple witnesses regarding a theft of ₹2,32,000 in gold, silver jewelry, and cash from a residential home in 2011, and evidence of recovery of some stolen goods from the co-accused Pitambar, the court found critical evidentiary gaps. Prosecution witnesses admitted they did not know who committed the theft, could not identify the accused as perpetrators, and had no direct evidence linking the accused to the crime. Panchnama witnesses could not substantiate their documentary evidence, and the recovered materials could not be conclusively connected to the complainant's case. Consequently, the court held the prosecution failed to establish the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts