THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LALJIBHAI HARJIBHAI KAMEJALIYA Advocate - V B DHADHAL — 152/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(3),296(B),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT020004512026
Filing Number
152/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
152/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190008250470
Police Station
BOTAD RURAL POLICE STATION - BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.LALJIBHAI HARJIBHAI KAMEJALIYA Advocate - V B DHADHAL
-
2.VIJAYBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI KAMEJALIYA
Adv. V B DHADHAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. LALJIBHAI HARJIBHAI KAMEJALIYA & VIJAYBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI KAMEJALIYA Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants of all charges under IPC 2023 sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54 and GP Act section 135, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's testimony was inconsistent and unsupported by corroborating witnesses, with no credible evidence establishing that defendants assaulted or abused the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 152/2026
Case Summary: THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. LALJIBHAI HARJIBHAI KAMEJALIYA & VIJAYBHAI GHANSHYAMBHAI KAMEJALIYA Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants of all charges under IPC 2023 sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54 and GP Act section 135, finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's testimony was inconsistent and unsupported by corroborating witnesses, with no credible evidence establishing that defendants assaulted or abused the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts