THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ISHWARBHAI ALIAS TIKU GORABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A M SAKALIYA — 151/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),352,351(2),296(B),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 14th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT020004502026
Filing Number
151/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
151/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190008250477
Police Station
BOTAD RURAL POLICE STATION - BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ISHWARBHAI ALIAS TIKU GORABHAI SOLANKI Advocate - A M SAKALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 03-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: FO.KE. No. 151/2026 The court acquitted defendant Ishwarbhai alias Tiku Gorabhai Solanki of charges under IPC 2023 Sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(2), 352, 54, and GP Act Section 135. The prosecution failed to establish the alleged assault and abusive conduct against the complainant through credible witness testimony, as both prosecution witnesses provided inconsistent accounts that did not corroborate the complaint's substantive allegations. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient in quality to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: FO.KE. No. 151/2026 The court acquitted defendant Ishwarbhai alias Tiku Gorabhai Solanki of charges under IPC 2023 Sections 115(2), 296(b), 351(2), 352, 54, and GP Act Section 135. The prosecution failed to establish the alleged assault and abusive conduct against the complainant through credible witness testimony, as both prosecution witnesses provided inconsistent accounts that did not corroborate the complaint's substantive allegations. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient in quality to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts