THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHARATBHAI VITTHALBHAI KAMEJALIYA Advocate - S N PARMAR — 148/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(3),296(B),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT020004472026

Filing Number

148/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

148/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190008250469

Police Station

BOTAD RURAL POLICE STATION - BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(3),296(B),54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI VITTHALBHAI KAMEJALIYA Advocate - S N PARMAR

  2. 2.VITTHALBHAI DHARAMSHIBHAI KAMEJALIYA

    Adv. S N PARMAR

  3. 3.PRABHUBHAI VITTHALBHAI KAMEJALIYA

    Adv. S N PARMAR

  4. 4.ISHWARBHAI DHARAMSHIBHAI KAMEJALIYA

    Adv. S N PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kamejaliya Case Number: 148/2026 Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Botad Decided: 10 April 2026 Decision The court acquitted all four defendants (Bharatbhai Vitthalbhai Kamejaliya, Vitthalbhai Dharamshibhai Kamejaliya, Prabhubhai Vitthalbhai Kamejaliya, and Ishwarbhai Dharamshibhai Kamejaliya) of charges under IPC 2023 sections 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant alleged the defendants caused injuries following a boundary dispute, the complainant's own testimony did not substantiate the alleged assault. The prosecution's key witnesses did not establish that the defendants actually inflicted injuries or used weapons, and the defence counsel's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies undermining the prosecution's narrative. The court found the evidence quality insufficient despite accepting that common law principles require weighing evidence quality over quantity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kamejaliya Case Number: 148/2026 Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Botad Decided: 10 April 2026 Decision The court acquitted all four defendants (Bharatbhai Vitthalbhai Kamejaliya, Vitthalbhai Dharamshibhai Kamejaliya, Prabhubhai Vitthalbhai Kamejaliya, and Ishwarbhai Dharamshibhai Kamejaliya) of charges under IPC 2023 sections 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant alleged the defendants caused injuries following a boundary dispute, the complainant's own testimony did not substantiate the alleged assault. The prosecution's key witnesses did not establish that the defendants actually inflicted injuries or used weapons, and the defence counsel's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies undermining the prosecution's narrative. The court found the evidence quality insufficient despite accepting that common law principles require weighing evidence quality over quantity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case