THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHARATBHAI VITTHALBHAI KAMEJALIYA Advocate - S N PARMAR — 148/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(1),115(2),352,351(3),296(B),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT020004472026
Filing Number
148/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
148/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190008250469
Police Station
BOTAD RURAL POLICE STATION - BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHARATBHAI VITTHALBHAI KAMEJALIYA Advocate - S N PARMAR
VITTHALBHAI DHARAMSHIBHAI KAMEJALIYA
Adv. S N PARMAR
PRABHUBHAI VITTHALBHAI KAMEJALIYA
Adv. S N PARMAR
ISHWARBHAI DHARAMSHIBHAI KAMEJALIYA
Adv. S N PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kamejaliya Case Number: 148/2026 Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Botad Decided: 10 April 2026 Decision The court acquitted all four defendants (Bharatbhai Vitthalbhai Kamejaliya, Vitthalbhai Dharamshibhai Kamejaliya, Prabhubhai Vitthalbhai Kamejaliya, and Ishwarbhai Dharamshibhai Kamejaliya) of charges under IPC 2023 sections 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant alleged the defendants caused injuries following a boundary dispute, the complainant's own testimony did not substantiate the alleged assault. The prosecution's key witnesses did not establish that the defendants actually inflicted injuries or used weapons, and the defence counsel's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies undermining the prosecution's narrative. The court found the evidence quality insufficient despite accepting that common law principles require weighing evidence quality over quantity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kamejaliya Case Number: 148/2026 Court: Chief Judicial Magistrate, Botad Decided: 10 April 2026 Decision The court acquitted all four defendants (Bharatbhai Vitthalbhai Kamejaliya, Vitthalbhai Dharamshibhai Kamejaliya, Prabhubhai Vitthalbhai Kamejaliya, and Ishwarbhai Dharamshibhai Kamejaliya) of charges under IPC 2023 sections 115(2), 118(1), 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54, and GP Act section 135. Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. While the complainant alleged the defendants caused injuries following a boundary dispute, the complainant's own testimony did not substantiate the alleged assault. The prosecution's key witnesses did not establish that the defendants actually inflicted injuries or used weapons, and the defence counsel's cross-examination revealed inconsistencies undermining the prosecution's narrative. The court found the evidence quality insufficient despite accepting that common law principles require weighing evidence quality over quantity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts