ALPESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI GHODAKIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 168/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBT020004372026
Filing Number
168/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
168/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190002250049
Police Station
BOTAD TOWN POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALPESHBHAI MAHENDRABHAI GHODAKIYA
Adv. M M SHEKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court allowed petitioner Alpeshbhai Mahendrabhai Ghodakiya's petition for recovery of seized property. The court ordered release of 30,000 rupees in cash seized by police, finding the petitioner had established ownership of the seized amount and that no other lawful claimant had appeared. The seized sum was directed to be returned to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond and proper identification documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Order/Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing P.P.
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing P.P.
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing P.P.
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing P.P.
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing P.P.
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 168/2026
The court allowed petitioner Alpeshbhai Mahendrabhai Ghodakiya's petition for recovery of seized property. The court ordered release of 30,000 rupees in cash seized by police, finding the petitioner had established ownership of the seized amount and that no other lawful claimant had appeared. The seized sum was directed to be returned to the petitioner upon furnishing a bond and proper identification documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts