ABASANA KIRANBHAI MAHENDRABHAI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 166/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJBT020004322026
Filing Number
166/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
166/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
4-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190002260135
Police Station
BOTAD TOWN POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ABASANA KIRANBHAI MAHENDRABHAI
Adv. N A TALAB
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING P.P.
HEARING P.P.
HEARING P.P.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
| 05-03-2026 | HEARING P.P. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted petitioner Abasana Kiranbhai Mahendrabhai's application for interim custody of his seized Hero Splendor motorcycle (Reg. GJ33-J-7935), finding him to be the registered owner with valid documentation. The court ordered release of the vehicle on furnishing bond equal to 1.5 times the assessed value, applying Supreme Court precedent that prolonged police custody of personal property causes unjustified hardship and violates justice principles. Release was granted subject to conditions including non-transfer of the vehicle, verification of engine/chassis numbers, and photographic documentation during return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted petitioner Abasana Kiranbhai Mahendrabhai's application for interim custody of his seized Hero Splendor motorcycle (Reg. GJ33-J-7935), finding him to be the registered owner with valid documentation. The court ordered release of the vehicle on furnishing bond equal to 1.5 times the assessed value, applying Supreme Court precedent that prolonged police custody of personal property causes unjustified hardship and violates justice principles. Release was granted subject to conditions including non-transfer of the vehicle, verification of engine/chassis numbers, and photographic documentation during return. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts