PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs LILABEN LAGHUBHAI CHEKHALIYA — 51/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020004082026
Filing Number
51/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
51/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1
Adv. V G VADODARIA
Respondent(s)
LILABEN LAGHUBHAI CHEKHALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 22-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | ISSUES |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Town 1 v. Lilaben Laghubhai Chekhaliya (51/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity bills. The defendant, a registered consumer, failed to pay Rs. 7,945.08 in consumption charges from November 2024 to October 2025 despite legal notice and defaulted ex-parte proceedings. The court upheld the principal claim but reduced the claimed 24% interest to 6% simple interest per annum, finding no contractual/statutory basis for the higher rate. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount plus 6% interest from suit filing until realization, plus costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Town 1 v. Lilaben Laghubhai Chekhaliya (51/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity bills. The defendant, a registered consumer, failed to pay Rs. 7,945.08 in consumption charges from November 2024 to October 2025 despite legal notice and defaulted ex-parte proceedings. The court upheld the principal claim but reduced the claimed 24% interest to 6% simple interest per annum, finding no contractual/statutory basis for the higher rate. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount plus 6% interest from suit filing until realization, plus costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts