PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI CHEKHALIYA — 56/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT020004002026

Case disposed

Filing Number

56/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

56/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1

Adv. V G VADODARIA

Respondent(s)

DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI CHEKHALIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE

05-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

22-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

15-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

16-03-2026

ISSUES

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: RCS 56/2026 Court Decision: The court partly allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity dues. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount of Rs. 6,639.27 plus 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date until realization, along with costs. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for 24% interest as unsupported by contract or statute. Key Reasoning: The court found the defendant liable based on undisputed documentary evidence (Consumer Ledger Account and Technical Report) showing accumulated arrears from Nov 2023 to Oct 2025. Since the defendant failed to appear or file any written statement despite notice, the unchallenged figures were deemed admitted under the doctrine of non-traverse, establishing the electricity debt and the statutory contract binding the defendant to pay under the Electricity Act, 2003. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 56/2026 Court Decision: The court partly allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity dues. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount of Rs. 6,639.27 plus 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date until realization, along with costs. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for 24% interest as unsupported by contract or statute. Key Reasoning: The court found the defendant liable based on undisputed documentary evidence (Consumer Ledger Account and Technical Report) showing accumulated arrears from Nov 2023 to Oct 2025. Since the defendant failed to appear or file any written statement despite notice, the unchallenged figures were deemed admitted under the doctrine of non-traverse, establishing the electricity debt and the statutory contract binding the defendant to pay under the Electricity Act, 2003. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case