PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI CHEKHALIYA — 56/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020004002026
Filing Number
56/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
56/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1
Adv. V G VADODARIA
Respondent(s)
DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI CHEKHALIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 22-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | ISSUES |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCS 56/2026 Court Decision: The court partly allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity dues. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount of Rs. 6,639.27 plus 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date until realization, along with costs. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for 24% interest as unsupported by contract or statute. Key Reasoning: The court found the defendant liable based on undisputed documentary evidence (Consumer Ledger Account and Technical Report) showing accumulated arrears from Nov 2023 to Oct 2025. Since the defendant failed to appear or file any written statement despite notice, the unchallenged figures were deemed admitted under the doctrine of non-traverse, establishing the electricity debt and the statutory contract binding the defendant to pay under the Electricity Act, 2003. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 56/2026 Court Decision: The court partly allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity dues. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount of Rs. 6,639.27 plus 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date until realization, along with costs. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim for 24% interest as unsupported by contract or statute. Key Reasoning: The court found the defendant liable based on undisputed documentary evidence (Consumer Ledger Account and Technical Report) showing accumulated arrears from Nov 2023 to Oct 2025. Since the defendant failed to appear or file any written statement despite notice, the unchallenged figures were deemed admitted under the doctrine of non-traverse, establishing the electricity debt and the statutory contract binding the defendant to pay under the Electricity Act, 2003. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts