PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs TINABEN RAMESHBHAI ADANIYA — 55/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020003992026
Filing Number
55/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1
Adv. V G VADODARIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.TINABEN RAMESHBHAI ADANIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Town 1 v. Tinaben Rameshbhai Adaniya (55/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 6,581.28 in outstanding electricity bills from the defendant consumer. The court found the plaintiff proved the debt through consumer ledger accounts and technical reports, and established the defendant's statutory liability under the Electricity Act, 2003. However, the court rejected the claimed 24% interest rate as unsupported by contract or statute, awarding instead 6% simple interest per annum from filing date until realization, deeming it just and reasonable under commercial trends. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
02-May-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
23-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
15-Apr-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2026
Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Town 1 v. Tinaben Rameshbhai Adaniya (55/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 6,581.28 in outstanding electricity bills from the defendant consumer. The court found the plaintiff proved the debt through consumer ledger accounts and technical reports, and established the defendant's statutory liability under the Electricity Act, 2003. However, the court rejected the claimed 24% interest rate as unsupported by contract or statute, awarding instead 6% simple interest per annum from filing date until realization, deeming it just and reasonable under commercial trends. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts