PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs TINABEN RAMESHBHAI ADANIYA — 55/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020003992026
Filing Number
55/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1
Adv. V G VADODARIA
Respondent(s)
TINABEN RAMESHBHAI ADANIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 23-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 22-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 15-04-2026 | ISSUES |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Town 1 v. Tinaben Rameshbhai Adaniya (55/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 6,581.28 in outstanding electricity bills from the defendant consumer. The court found the plaintiff proved the debt through consumer ledger accounts and technical reports, and established the defendant's statutory liability under the Electricity Act, 2003. However, the court rejected the claimed 24% interest rate as unsupported by contract or statute, awarding instead 6% simple interest per annum from filing date until realization, deeming it just and reasonable under commercial trends. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Town 1 v. Tinaben Rameshbhai Adaniya (55/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 6,581.28 in outstanding electricity bills from the defendant consumer. The court found the plaintiff proved the debt through consumer ledger accounts and technical reports, and established the defendant's statutory liability under the Electricity Act, 2003. However, the court rejected the claimed 24% interest rate as unsupported by contract or statute, awarding instead 6% simple interest per annum from filing date until realization, deeming it just and reasonable under commercial trends. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts