PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1 vs NITABEN KIRANBHAI GHODAKIYA — 54/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 05th May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020003982026
Filing Number
54/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PGVCL BOTAD TOWN 1
Adv. V G VADODARIA
Respondent(s)
NITABEN KIRANBHAI GHODAKIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 23-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 22-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 15-04-2026 | ISSUES |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Town 1 v. Nitaben Kiranbhai Ghodakiya (54/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity dues of Rs. 5,824.04 against the defendant, a domestic consumer who defaulted on payments from November 2024 to October 2025. The court ordered the defendant to pay the principal amount plus 6% simple interest per annum from the suit filing date, rejecting PGVCL's claim for 24% interest as lacking contractual or statutory basis. The defendant, who failed to appear despite notice, bore court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Town 1 v. Nitaben Kiranbhai Ghodakiya (54/2026) The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity dues of Rs. 5,824.04 against the defendant, a domestic consumer who defaulted on payments from November 2024 to October 2025. The court ordered the defendant to pay the principal amount plus 6% simple interest per annum from the suit filing date, rejecting PGVCL's claim for 24% interest as lacking contractual or statutory basis. The defendant, who failed to appear despite notice, bore court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts