PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD vs DEVABHAI VIBHABHAI Advocate - EX PARTY — 41/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020002452026
Filing Number
41/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
41/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD
Adv. P R BATHWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVABHAI VIBHABHAI Advocate - EX PARTY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case 41/2026 Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 72,606.55 in unpaid electricity bills against defendant Devabhai Vibhabhai, who failed to appear or respond. The court confirmed the defendant's consumer status and liability for the principal amount, but reduced the claimed interest from 24% per annum to 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount, 6% interest, and all court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 41/2026
Case 41/2026 Summary The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of Rs. 72,606.55 in unpaid electricity bills against defendant Devabhai Vibhabhai, who failed to appear or respond. The court confirmed the defendant's consumer status and liability for the principal amount, but reduced the claimed interest from 24% per annum to 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate. The defendant was ordered to pay the principal amount, 6% interest, and all court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts