THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHAVESHBHAI VIRAMBHAI BHUNDIYA Advocate - K G DABHI — 53/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 351(3),396(B),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT020001822026

Filing Number

53/2026

Filing Date

13-Jan-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190008250456

Police Station

BOTAD RURAL POLICE STATION - BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 351(3),396(B),352,54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135
Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 Section 183,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAVESHBHAI VIRAMBHAI BHUNDIYA Advocate - K G DABHI

  2. 2.BHURABHAI KHETABHAI BHUNDIYA

    Adv. K G DABHI

  3. 3.VIRAMBHAI RATABHAI BHUNDIYA

    Adv. K G DABHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bhaveshbhai Virambhai Bhundiya (Case 53/2026) The court acquitted all three defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54, and related provisions. The complainant alleged the defendants trespassed on his cotton field with livestock, assaulted him and his family with threats, and caused crop damage. However, the court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient—the key witness (complainant) provided testimony that contradicted the charges, and cross-examination revealed inconsistencies. The court concluded the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged offenses beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding injury or abusive language. All three accused were discharged and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 03-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  9. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 53/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bhaveshbhai Virambhai Bhundiya (Case 53/2026) The court acquitted all three defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54, and related provisions. The complainant alleged the defendants trespassed on his cotton field with livestock, assaulted him and his family with threats, and caused crop damage. However, the court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient—the key witness (complainant) provided testimony that contradicted the charges, and cross-examination revealed inconsistencies. The court concluded the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged offenses beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding injury or abusive language. All three accused were discharged and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case