THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHAVESHBHAI VIRAMBHAI BHUNDIYA Advocate - K G DABHI — 53/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 351(3),396(B),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJBT020001822026
Filing Number
53/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11190008250456
Police Station
BOTAD RURAL POLICE STATION - BOTAD DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHAVESHBHAI VIRAMBHAI BHUNDIYA Advocate - K G DABHI
BHURABHAI KHETABHAI BHUNDIYA
Adv. K G DABHI
VIRAMBHAI RATABHAI BHUNDIYA
Adv. K G DABHI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 23-04-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 03-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bhaveshbhai Virambhai Bhundiya (Case 53/2026) The court acquitted all three defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54, and related provisions. The complainant alleged the defendants trespassed on his cotton field with livestock, assaulted him and his family with threats, and caused crop damage. However, the court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient—the key witness (complainant) provided testimony that contradicted the charges, and cross-examination revealed inconsistencies. The court concluded the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged offenses beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding injury or abusive language. All three accused were discharged and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bhaveshbhai Virambhai Bhundiya (Case 53/2026) The court acquitted all three defendants of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 296(b), 351(3), 352, 54, and related provisions. The complainant alleged the defendants trespassed on his cotton field with livestock, assaulted him and his family with threats, and caused crop damage. However, the court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient—the key witness (complainant) provided testimony that contradicted the charges, and cross-examination revealed inconsistencies. The court concluded the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the alleged offenses beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding injury or abusive language. All three accused were discharged and acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts