THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VASIMBHAI YUNUSBHAI MANKAD Advocate - N G VADODARIA — 52/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJBT020001242025

Filing Number

52/2025

Filing Date

08-Jan-2025

Registration No

52/2025

Registration Date

08-Jan-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 31-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11190002240898

Police Station

BOTAD TOWN POLICE STATION – BOTAD DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 504,506(2),114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VASIMBHAI YUNUSBHAI MANKAD Advocate - N G VADODARIA

  2. 2.YUNUSHBHAI MUSHABHAI MANKAD

    Adv. N G VADODARIA

  3. 3.ROSHANBEN YUNUSHBHAI MUSHABHAI MANKAD

    Adv. N G VADODARIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-May-2026

    Judegement

    CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Case No. 52/2025 The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Botad acquitted all three accused—Vasimbhai Yunusbhai Mankad, Yunusbhai Mushabhai Mankad, and Roshanben Yunusbhai Mankad—of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused abused or threatened the complainant, as specific abusive words were not recorded on evidence and the alleged intimidation lacked corroboration. The judgment emphasized that mere allegations of abuse without documented evidence and substantiation of actual harm cannot constitute criminal culpability under these sections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 08-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 05-May-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 13-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 10-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 19-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 12-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 10-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 27-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 06-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 16-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  26. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 20-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 08-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: Criminal Case No. 52/2025 The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Botad acquitted all three accused—Vasimbhai Yunusbhai Mankad, Yunusbhai Mushabhai Mankad, and Roshanben Yunusbhai Mankad—of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 504, 506(2), and 114. The court found the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused abused or threatened the complainant, as specific abusive words were not recorded on evidence and the alleged intimidation lacked corroboration. The judgment emphasized that mere allegations of abuse without documented evidence and substantiation of actual harm cannot constitute criminal culpability under these sections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case