PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD vs DHORIYA DAYABHAI GANDABHAI — 32/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT020001052026

Filing Number

32/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD

    Adv. P R BATHWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHORIYA DAYABHAI GANDABHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery against the defendant. The court found the defendant illegally consumed 2,570 watts of electricity by bypassing the meter and ordered payment of the principal amount of Rs. 1,11,156.07 plus 6% simple interest per annum (reducing the claimed 18% rate). The defendant, who failed to appear or defend, must also bear all litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery against the defendant. The court found the defendant illegally consumed 2,570 watts of electricity by bypassing the meter and ordered payment of the principal amount of Rs. 1,11,156.07 plus 6% simple interest per annum (reducing the claimed 18% rate). The defendant, who failed to appear or defend, must also bear all litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case