PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD vs DANKUBHAI BHAVKUBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - EX PARTY — 17/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT020000762026

Filing Number

17/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD

    Adv. P R BATHWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DANKUBHAI BHAVKUBHAI KHACHAR Advocate - EX PARTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 17/2026 The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity dues of Rs. 11,316.85 against defendant Dankubhai Khachar. The court upheld the principal amount based on unchallenged documentary evidence establishing the defendant's consumer status and liability, but rejected the plaintiff's claim for 24% interest, substituting it with 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 17/2026 The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of outstanding electricity dues of Rs. 11,316.85 against defendant Dankubhai Khachar. The court upheld the principal amount based on unchallenged documentary evidence establishing the defendant's consumer status and liability, but rejected the plaintiff's claim for 24% interest, substituting it with 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case