PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD vs MADHABHAI LAXMANBHAI TAVIYA LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED LAXMANBHAI NARSHIBHAI TAVIYA Advocate - EX PARTY — 16/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJBT020000752026
Filing Number
16/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
16/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, BOTAD
Judge
3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PGVCL SUB DIVISION PALIYAD
Adv. P R BATHWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.MADHABHAI LAXMANBHAI TAVIYA LEGAL HEIR OF DECEASED LAXMANBHAI NARSHIBHAI TAVIYA Advocate - EX PARTY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The Principal Senior Civil Judge at Botad partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of unpaid electricity bills totaling Rs. 9,793.23 against the defendant. The court ordered the defendant to pay the principal amount plus 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date until realization, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed 24% interest rate for lack of contractual or statutory basis. The defendant was also directed to bear litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Issues
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2026
The Principal Senior Civil Judge at Botad partially allowed PGVCL's suit for recovery of unpaid electricity bills totaling Rs. 9,793.23 against the defendant. The court ordered the defendant to pay the principal amount plus 6% simple interest per annum from the filing date until realization, rejecting the plaintiff's claimed 24% interest rate for lack of contractual or statutory basis. The defendant was also directed to bear litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts