P.G.V.C.L BOTAD RURAL vs KISHANBHAI HIMATBHAI VANALI Advocate - EX PARTY — 13/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT020000512026

Filing Number

13/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

13/2026

Registration Date

01-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L BOTAD RURAL

    Adv. V G VADODARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KISHANBHAI HIMATBHAI VANALI Advocate - EX PARTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Kishanbhai for illegal electricity consumption. The court found that the defendant had illegally tapped 2329 watts from the plaintiff's power line without authorization and ordered payment of the principal amount of Rs.72,169.52. However, the court reduced the claimed interest rate from 24% to 6% per annum, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate, and awarded simple interest from the suit's filing date until realization. The defendant was also ordered to bear all costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 01-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court partially allowed PGVCL's suit against defendant Kishanbhai for illegal electricity consumption. The court found that the defendant had illegally tapped 2329 watts from the plaintiff's power line without authorization and ordered payment of the principal amount of Rs.72,169.52. However, the court reduced the claimed interest rate from 24% to 6% per annum, finding no contractual or statutory basis for the higher commercial rate, and awarded simple interest from the suit's filing date until realization. The defendant was also ordered to bear all costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case