P.G.V.C.L BOTAD RURAL vs HARESHBHAI DIYALBHAI MAKHNA Advocate - EX PARTY — 4/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT020000362026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

01-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L BOTAD RURAL

    Adv. V G VADODARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HARESHBHAI DIYALBHAI MAKHNA Advocate - EX PARTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 4/2026 Court Decision: The court partly allowed PGVCL's suit, ordering defendant Hareshbhai Diyalbhai Makhna to pay Rs. 34,343.19 (principal amount for illegal electricity consumption) plus 6% simple interest per annum from filing date. The court rejected the claimed 24% interest rate as unsupported by contract or statute, deeming 6% fair and reasonable under commercial trends. Key Reasoning: Operating ex-parte, the court found uncontroverted evidence—through witness affidavit, inspection reports, and documentary evidence—establishing that defendant illegally tapped 261 watts from PGVCL's power line without authorization. The defendant's non-appearance and failure to challenge the evidence left the plaintiff's case unchallenged, satisfying the prima facie burden required in ex-parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 01-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 4/2026 Court Decision: The court partly allowed PGVCL's suit, ordering defendant Hareshbhai Diyalbhai Makhna to pay Rs. 34,343.19 (principal amount for illegal electricity consumption) plus 6% simple interest per annum from filing date. The court rejected the claimed 24% interest rate as unsupported by contract or statute, deeming 6% fair and reasonable under commercial trends. Key Reasoning: Operating ex-parte, the court found uncontroverted evidence—through witness affidavit, inspection reports, and documentary evidence—establishing that defendant illegally tapped 261 watts from PGVCL's power line without authorization. The defendant's non-appearance and failure to challenge the evidence left the plaintiff's case unchallenged, satisfying the prima facie burden required in ex-parte proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case