P.G.V.C.L BOTAD RURAL vs KANUBHAI SUKHABHAI SATHLIYA Advocate - EX PARTY — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJBT020000302026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

01-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

01-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, BOTAD

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.G.V.C.L BOTAD RURAL

    Adv. V G VADODARIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANUBHAI SUKHABHAI SATHLIYA Advocate - EX PARTY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Rural v. Kanubhai Sukhabhai Sathaliya (2/2026) The Principal Senior Civil Judge at Botad partly allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery. The court found that the defendant illegally tapped 1060 watts from the company's power line without authorization and ordered him to pay the principal amount of Rs. 29,052.64. However, the court rejected the claimed 24% interest rate due to lack of contractual/statutory basis, awarding 6% simple interest per annum from suit filing until realization instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  8. 01-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 01-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PGVCL Botad Rural v. Kanubhai Sukhabhai Sathaliya (2/2026) The Principal Senior Civil Judge at Botad partly allowed PGVCL's suit for electricity theft recovery. The court found that the defendant illegally tapped 1060 watts from the company's power line without authorization and ordered him to pay the principal amount of Rs. 29,052.64. However, the court rejected the claimed 24% interest rate due to lack of contractual/statutory basis, awarding 6% simple interest per annum from suit filing until realization instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case